Skip to content
LetsInvest
Compare

First-time investor path · Lesson 5 of 7 · 7 min

Costs compound too: direct plans and the fee drag

Fees are the only part of investing you control with certainty — and they are charged every year on your entire corpus, not just your contributions.

Where the money leaks

Every mutual fund charges an expense ratio — a percentage of the corpus deducted annually to run the scheme. The same scheme usually comes in two versions: the Regular plan (the distributor trail commission is baked into a higher expense ratio) and the Direct plan (you buy from the AMC or a no-commission platform, at the lower ratio).

The typical direct–regular gap for equity funds is around 0.8–1.2 percentage points (assumption below: 1%). One percent sounds trivial. It is charged on the whole corpus — including all previous growth — every single year, so it compounds against you exactly the way your returns compound for you.

The defence is boring and complete: prefer direct plans, check the TER printed in the scheme's factsheet, and remember that every extra percent of cost is a percent of return you need the market to make up first.

What a 1% expense gap does over 20 years

Assumptions: ₹10,000 monthly SIP, 20 years; both plans earn 12% gross; the Regular plan's extra expense ratio cuts its net return to 11%.

  1. Direct plan (12% net)

    r = 1%/month, n = 240 → 1.01²⁴⁰ = 10.8926 → FV = ₹10,000 × ((10.8926 − 1) ÷ 0.01) × 1.01 ≈ ₹99.91L

  2. Regular plan (11% net)

    r = 0.9167%/month → 1.009167²⁴⁰ = 8.9353 → FV ≈ ₹87.36L

  3. Fee drag

    ₹99.91L − ₹87.36L = ₹12.56L

  4. As a share of the direct corpus

    ₹12.56L ÷ ₹99.91L ≈ 12.6% of your ending wealth

Same fund, same gross returns, same contributions — the Regular plan hands over roughly ₹12.6 lakh of your ₹1 crore outcome, about one-eighth of everything you could have owned.

Drag the fee and watch the gap

Set your SIP and the expense-ratio gap between direct and regular — see the corpus both ways and what the difference costs.

Given away to fees in 20 years

₹12.56 L

Direct-plan corpus instead

₹99.91 L

Direct planRegular plan
₹4.35 L₹4.28 L₹10.58 L₹10.23 L₹19.48 L₹18.49 L₹32.23 L₹29.96 L₹50.46 L₹45.89 L₹76.54 L₹68.01 L₹99.91 L₹87.36 LYr 3Yr 6Yr 9Yr 12Yr 15Yr 18Yr 20
Same fund, same gross returns — only the expense ratio differs. The fee is charged every year on the whole corpus, so the gap compounds against you.

Same fund, same gross returns — only the expense ratio differs. The fee is charged every year on the whole corpus, so the gap compounds against you.

Figures are labelled assumptions for teaching, not forecasts — see the sources note at the end of this lesson.

Misconception check

An agent sets up your SIP in a Regular plan and charges you nothing. He says: 'The AMC pays me, not you.' Is he right?

An agent sets up your SIP in a Regular plan and charges you nothing. He says: 'The AMC pays me, not you.' Is he right?

Ends in a tool

Quantify your own drag

Enter your SIP and the two plans' TERs; see the rupee cost of the commission trail over your holding period.

Quantify your own drag

Where the numbers come from

  • Assumption: 1 percentage point direct–regular TER gap (typical equity-fund range ≈ 0.8–1.2pp)
  • Assumption: 12% gross return for both plans

No live prices or NAVs are used anywhere in this path. Lesson 5 of 7, First-time investor path.

Finished reading? Mark it done — progress is saved in this browser, no account needed.

Educational, not advisory: LetsInvest is a research publication, not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Every figure in this lesson is either named to an official source or labelled an assumption — no live prices or NAVs.

Some links on this page earn us a commission at no cost to you. How we make money

How we research. Every fee on this site carries a source and a verification date. Data is re-checked against official broker pages; read our editorial methodology. LetsInvest is a research publication, not a financial adviser — see our terms.

← All First-time investor path lessons